According to the United Nations Economic and social institutions data in 2011. Climate change has emerged as one of the main problems at the beginning of the 21st century. The long history of Yogyakarta City as the center of government and center of activity has resulted in demographic pressures that have an impact on increasing GHG emissions. Human activities that tend to prioritize economic and social needs and exclude ecology can increase the potential for disasters due to the effects of climate change. This climate disaster requires attention because it can cause damage and if it is not addressed it will cause a greater loss of the new paradigm of Good Governance and Good Environmental Governance in the concept of sustainable development needs to be integrated into environmental planning. Furthermore, the role of local governments in improving community adaptability on a community scale through the Climate Village Program (ProKlim) is expected to succeed in the national GHG emission reduction target by adjusting to the potential and problems in their respective regions. The method used in this study with an analysis that is descriptive qualitative, in-depth interviews were carried out to several selected key persons. Based on the research, it is known that the stages carried out by the Yogyakarta City Government by the guidelines for implementing ProKlim include preparation, planning, implementation, development, and strengthening of actions that can increase adaptive capacity in the community. Through the implementation of ProKlim activities, the success of the activities is evidenced by the emergence of new villages that implement climate change adaptation and mitigation in each village every year.

climate change; climate village program; role of regional government

1. Birkmann, J., Garschagen, M., Kraas, F., Quang, N. (2010). Adaptive urban governance : new challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. 5, 185–206. doi:10.1007/s11625-010-0111-3.
2. Budiati, L. (2012). Good Governance dalam pengelolaan lingkungan hidup. Ghalia Indonesia.
3. Bull-Kamanga, L., Diagne, K., Lavell, A., Leon, E., Lerise, F., Macgregor, H., Maskrey, A., Meshack, M., Pelling, M., Reid, H., Satterthwaite, D., Songsore, J., Westgate, K., & Yitambe, A. (2003). From everyday hazards to disasters : the accumulation of risk in urban areas. Environment and Urbanization, 15(1), 193–204. doi: 10.1177/095624780301500109.
4. Christiyanti, M. I. (2018). Tesis kajian ekosistem terumbu karang dan partisipasi masyarakat untu pengembangan wisata alam di pantai Sadranan-Slili Kabupaten Gunung Kidul. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
5. Garschagen, M., & Kraas, F. (2011). Urban climate change adaptation in the context of transformation : lessons from Vietnam. Resilient Cities: Cities and Adaptation to Climate Change Proceedings of the Global Forum 2010 Local Sustainability 1, 131–139. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0785-6.
6. Glouberman, S., Gemar, M., Campsie, P., Miller, G., Armstrong, J., Newman, C., Siotis, A., & Groff, P. (2006). A framework for improving health in cities : A discussion paper. Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 83(2), 325–338. doi:10.1007/s11524-006-9034-9.
7. Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2011). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
8. Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., & Lo, K. (2010). Global surface temperature change. 1–29. doi:10.1029/2010RG000345.
9. Hughes, S. (2013). Justice in Urban Climate Change Adaptation: Criteria and Application to Delhi. Ecology and Society, 18(4).
10. IPCC. (2001). Climate Change 2001 : Synthesis report climate change 2001 : Synthesis report.
11. IPCC. (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation.
12. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2016). Peraturan tentang ProKlim.
13. Mardikanto, T & Soebiao, P. (2013). Pemberdayaan masyarakat dalam presektif kebijakan publik. Bandung, Alfabeta.
14. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage Publishers.
15. Mina, R. (2016). Desentralisasi perlindungan dan pengelolaan lingkungan hidup sebagai alternatif menyelesaikan permasalahan lingkungan hidup. Arena Hukum, 9(2), 149–165.
16. Pelling, M. (2003). The vulnerability of cities: Natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan, London.
17. Romero-lankao, P., & Renewable, N. (2015). Urban areas carbon and climate governance. IHDP update: governance as a crosscutting theme. Human Dimensions Science, 3(April), 14–19.
18. Roy, A. (2005). Urban Informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association,71(2), 147-158. doi: 10.1080/01944360508976689.
19. Satterthwaite, D. (2004). Poverty reduction in urban areas series and middle-income nations (Working Paper on Poverty Reduction in Urban Areas 14).
20. Sugandhy, A dan Hakim, R. (2007). Prinsip dasar kebijakan pembangunan berkelanjutan berwawasan lingkungan. Jakarta:PT Bumi Aksara.
21. Usman, S. (1998). Pembangunan dan pemberdayaan masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.