“Why The Media Often Gets Us Wrong?”: The Public Fantasies and Media’s Portrayal of Trans Women in Indonesia

Open Access
Article Info
Submitted: 2024-11-08
Published: 2024-11-15
Section: Articles
Language: EN
Reporting practices and the flow of information disseminated through mass media are inherently never one-directional looking from a sociocultural standpoint. Media plays a crucial role in re-projecting social narratives into a synthesis of notions to be more easily accepted by the public. Mediatized information is inextricably linked to how human thought is processed with their elaborations—which are expressed and articulated within societal dynamics—further clarifies that mass media also contributes in shaping the dynamics within the society itself. Henceforth, it is believed that the stigmatization and stereotypes against trans women in Indonesia are not solely driven by how the media portrayed them, but also by the deeply rooted public fantasies about gender norms. To examine how these affect trans women in Indonesia, a qualitative method was employed in this research with in-depth interviews and participant observations on several trans women in Semarang.  A wider range of perspectives and perceptions were uncovered regarding the complexity between trans women and the mass media, along with the intrigues highlighting the ambiguity of freedom they possess. This research adopts Erving Goffman’s framing theory which highlights the existence of various schemes in how individuals perceive the world. Furthermore, Goffman’s theory intersects with how mass media reports the news, which can significantly have an impact on reconstructing social reality and creating a perceptual framework that is no longer multi-interpretive due to the framing of information. The findings indicate that without considering the characteristics of the depicted society, mass media cannot effectively convey its messages to achieve audience acceptance.

Keywords

Trans women, Waria, Stigmatization and Stereotyping, Mass Media

References

  1. Setiadi, E. M.: Pengantar Ringkas Sosiologi: Pemahaman Fakta dan Gejala Permasalahan Sosial Teori, Aplikasi, dan Pemecahannya. 1st edn. Prenada Media, Jakarta, Indonesia (2020).
  2. Abar, A. Z.: Ke Arah Studi “Etno-Media”. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik 4(2), 135–150 (2000).
  3. Muttaqin, A.: Pola Keberagaman Masyarakat Marginal. KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi 8(2), 129–156 (2014).
  4. Fadhlina, A.: Waria, Worship, and Welfare: Exploring Trans Women’s Conditions of Precarity Amidst COVID-19 in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and –National Studies of Southeast Asia 12(1), 78–94 (2024).
  5. Goffman, E.: Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. 1st edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1963).
  6. Goffman, E.: Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. (1974).
  7. Žižek, S.: The Plague of Fantasies. Verso Books, London, UK. (2008).
  8. Arfanda, F., Anwar, S.: Konstruksi Sosial Masyarakat Terhadap Waria. Jurnal Nasional Ilmu Kesehatan 1(1), 93–102 (2015).
  9. Bennett, L.R., Davies, S. G., Hidayana, I. M.: Seksualitas di Indonesia: Politik Seksual, Kesehatan, Keberagaman, dan Representasi. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. (2017).
  10. Sobur, A.: Analisis Teks Media: Suatu Pengantar untuk Analisis Wacana, Analisis Semiotik, dan Analisis Framing. 7th edn. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung, Indonesia (2015).

  1. Dinara Tsafina Asmarani  Faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia, Indonesia
  2. Vania Pramudita Hanjani  Faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia, Indonesia