INFLUENCE OF INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONERS, AUDIT COMMITE, INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP, AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ON TAX AVOIDANCE

Open Access
Article Info
Submitted: 2026-07-03
Published: 2026-07-15
Section: Articles
Language: EN
Introduction/Main Objectives: This study aims to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) proxied by Independent Commissioners, Audit Committee, and Institutional Ownership, as well as Corporate Social Responsibility proxied by the Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Index (CSRDI) measured based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) 4.0 as many as 91 indicators

 

Background Problems: Tax avoidance remains a major concern in Indonesia’s fiscal system, as companies seek to legally minimize their tax burdens. This study aims to answer the research question: How do Independent Commissioners, Audit Committees, Institutional Ownership, and Corporate Social Responsibility affect tax avoidance in healthcare companies?

 

Novelty: This research contributes by focusing on the healthcare sub-sector manufacturing companies in the 2019-2022 period, combining GCG and CSR factors within a single analytical model that has been underexplored in prior studies.

 

Research Methods: This study uses secondary data taken from the population of health companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange vulnerable for a period of 4 years, namely 2019-2022 as many as 33 companies. The number of samples in this study amounted to 13 companies with a total sample of 52 data that had been selected using purposive sampling technique. The method used in this research is multiple linear regression assisted by Statistical Program for Social Science (SPSS) Version 25 software. Findings/Results: The results of this research state that Independent Commissioners, Audit Committees, Institutional Ownership, and Corporate Social Responsibility partially have a significant positive effect on Tax Avoidance in healthcare companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2019-2022 period.

 

Conclusion: The results of this research are consistent with previous research which shows that Independent Commissioners, Audit Committees, Institutional Ownership, and Corporate Social Responsibility have an influence on agents' Tax Avoidance practices.

 

Implementation Potential: The findings provide implications for regulators to strengthen governance and CSR policies and for academics to enhance understanding of ethical tax practices.

Keywords : Good Corporate Governance, Independent Commissioner, Audit Committee, Institutional Ownership, Corporate Social Responsibility, Tax Avoidance

JEL Classification : (list the relevant JEL codes separated by commas, refer to https://www.aeaweb.org/jel/guide/jel.php)

References

  1. Almasyah, Y. H., & Durya, N. P. M. A. (2021). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Dan Corporate
  2. Social Responsibility Disclosure Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Accounting Cycle Journal,
  3. (2), 1–20. http://journal.podomorouniversity.ac.id/index.php/ACJ/article/view/212/161
  4. Am, G. G., & Friantin, S. H. E. (2023). Analisis Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dan
  5. Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Terhadap Tax Avoidance Pada Perusahaan
  6. Manufaktur Sektor Industri Barang Konsumsi yang Terdaftar di BEI. CEBONG Journal,
  7. (3), 101–107. https://plus62.isha.or.id/index.php/cebong/article/view/146
  8. Amelia, R., Muslih, M., & Kurnia. (2022). The Effect of Good Corporate Governance on Tax
  9. Avoidance in Mining Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2018-
  10. Period. 9(5), 3046–3052.
  11. Andriyanto, T., & Marfiana, A. (2021). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Perusahaan Terhadap
  12. Tax Avoidance di Indonesia Dengan Corporate Governance Sebagai Variabel Moderasi.
  13. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara, 3(1), 178–196.
  14. https://jurnal.pknstan.ac.id/index.php/pkn/article/view/1226/688
  15. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024, January). Realisasi Pendapatan Negara (Milyar Rupiah).
  16. Batubara, M. B., Sari, R. H. D. P., & Fahria, R. (2021). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance
  17. dan Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Business Management,
  18. Economic, and Accounting National Seminar, 2, 1202–1217.
  19. https://conference.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/biema/article/view/2054
  20. Bayhaqi, D. Al. (2023). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional, Dewan Komisaris Independen,
  21. Komite Audit, Kualitas Audit, dan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Terhadap Tax
  22. Avoidance. DIPONEGORO JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING.
  23. Cobham, A., Bernardo, J. G., Palansky, M., & Mansour, M. B. (2020). The State of Tax Justice
  24. : Tax Justice in the time of COVID-19.163
  25. Dewi, S. L., & Oktaviani, R. M. (2021). Pengaruh Leverage, Capital Intensity, Komisaris
  26. Independen dan Kepemilikan Institusional Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Studi
  27. Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(2), 179–194.
  28. Dilinanda, C. A., & Laturette, K. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance dan
  29. Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Media Akuntansi Dan
  30. Perpajakan Indonesia, 4(2), 201–224.
  31. https://journal.uc.ac.id/index.php/mapi/article/view/3715
  32. Farkhatul, H., Susanto, B., & Pramita, Y. D. (2022). Pengaruh Corporate Governance dan
  33. Kualitas Audit Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Borobudur Accounting Review, 2(2), 109–122.
  34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31603/bacr.6778
  35. Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariative dengan Program IBM SPSS 26 (4th ed.).
  36. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  37. Ginting, R. M. B., & Kartika, T. P. D. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Tata Kelola Perusahaan
  38. Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. AKUNESA: Jurnal Akuntansi Unesa, 11(3), 300–310.
  39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/akunesa.v11n3.p300-310
  40. Hamidah, Junaidi, Rialdy, N., Suhartono, E., Amusiana, Sahusilawane, W., Lidyah, R., Isfaatun,
  41. E., Lumbanraja, T., & Surayuda, R. N. I. (2023). PERPAJAKAN (P. T. Cahyono, Ed.).
  42. Yayasan Cendikia Mulia Mandiri.
  43. Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A Review of Tax Research. Journal of Accounting and
  44. Economics, 127–178.
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165410110000340
  46. Haryanti, A. D. (2019). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Terhadap Tax Avoidance (Studi Pada
  47. Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2017). Jurnal Akademisi Akuntansi,
  48. (1), 36–49. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jaa/article/view/8210/6714
  49. Hasnati. (2014). Komisaris Independen & Komite Audit: Organ Perusahaan yang Berperan
  50. untuk Mewujudkan Good Corporate Governance di Indonesia (A. D. Sulistya, Ed.).
  51. Absolute Media.164
  52. Hermawan, I. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed
  53. Method).
  54. Hidayatul Quran.
  55. Ilham, R. D., Handayani, D., & Dwiharyadi, A. (2022). Pengaruh Corporate Governance dan
  56. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) terhadap Tax Avoidance (Studi Empiris pada
  57. Perusahaan Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2017-2020).
  58. Jurnal Akuntansi, Bisnis Dan Ekonomi Indonesia (JABEI), 2(1), 56–64.
  59. https://akuntansi.pnp.ac.id/jabei/index.php/jabei/article/view/30
  60. Indradi, D., & Sumantri, I. I. (2020). Analisis Penghindaran Pajak Dengan Pendekatan Financial
  61. Distress dan Profitabilitas Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Sektor Industri Barang
  62. Konsumsi di BEI Tahun 2013-2017. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MANAGERIAL
  63. ACCOUNTING, 4(2), 262–276.
  64. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs
  65. and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X7690026X
  67. Kamayanti, A., Qomariyah, N., Muwidha, M., & Ernawati, W. D. (2023). The Significance of
  68. Financial Distress on Tax Avoidance Compared to Gender Diversity and Social
  69. Responsibility: A Study from Indonesia. MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING REVIEW,
  70. (2), 402–419.
  71. Kirana, A. S., & Sundari, S. (2022). Mekanisme Corporate Governance dan Corporate Social
  72. Responsibility Terhadap Tax Avoidance Pada Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan Batu
  73. Bara. Journal of Management and Bussines (JOMB), 4(2), 742–756.
  74. https://journal.ipm2kpe.or.id/index.php/JOMB/article/view/4265
  75. Krisna, A. M. (2019). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional dan Kepemilikan Manajerial pada
  76. Tax Avoidance dengan Kualitas Audit sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Wacana Ekonomi
  77. (Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi), 18(2), 82–91.
  78. https://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/wacana_ekonomi/article/view/1162165
  79. Laksmi P, K. W., Ariwangsa, I. G. N. O., & Trisna, N. N. P. B. (2023). Leverage Keuangan dan
  80. Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Tax Avoidance Pada Perusahaan Perbankan
  81. yang Terdaftar di BEI. Journal of Economics and Banking, 5(1), 100–108.
  82. Lupiyoadi, R., & Ikhsan, R. B. (2015). Good Corporate Governance: Teori dan Implementasi
  83. (2nd ed.). Salemba Empat.
  84. Mahdiana, M. Q., & Amin, M. N. (2020). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage, Ukuran Perusahaan,
  85. dan Sales Growth Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 7(1), 127–138.
  86. Makki, S. (2021, September 14). Pajak Global Bisa Raib Rp3.360 T Gegara Penghindaran
  87. Pajak. CNN INDONESIA. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20210913194843-
  88. - 693711/pajak-global-bisa-raib-rp3360-t-gegara-penghindaran-pajak
  89. Mukaromah, S. (2022). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Social
  90. Responsibility, dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. Mercu Buana University
  91. Institutional Repository. https://repository.mercubuana.ac.id/71121/
  92. Mulyani, S., Wijayanti, A., & Masitoh, E. (2018). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Terhadap
  93. Tax Avoidance (Perusahaan Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di BEI). Jurnal Riset Akuntansi
  94. Dan Bisnis Airlangga, 3(1), 322–340.
  95. Murtina, W. S., Putra, W. E., & Yustien, R. (2020). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance
  96. Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak (Tax Avoidance) (Studi Empiris Perusahaan Perbankan
  97. Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2015-2019). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 17(2), 47–66.
  98. Ningtyas, C. P., Kambolong, M., & Makmur, M. (2022). Implementasi Corporate Social
  99. Responsibility pada PT. Aneka Tambang Tbk. UBPN Sulawesi Tenggara. Journal
  100. Publicuho, 5(4), 1091–1112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i4.50
  101. Noorprasetya, Y., & Prasetya, M. T. (2023). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance dan
  102. Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Tax Avoidance (Studi Empiris Pada
  103. Perusahaan Food and Beverage yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia 2019-2022).
  104. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 10(2), 291–3014. https://www.ejournal.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/jat/article/view/17746/10314166
  105. Nurmawan, M., & Nuritomo. (2022). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Penghindaran
  106. Pajak. Proceeding of National Conference on Accounting & Finance, 4, 5–11.
  107. Pohan, C. A. (2019). Pedoman Lengkap Pajak Internasional Konsep, Strategi dan
  108. Penerapan (Revisi). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  109. Pohan, H. T. (2008). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance, Rasio Tobins, Perata Laba
  110. Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak pada Perusahaan Publik.
  111. http://hotmanpohan.blogspot.com/2010/09/penelitian-hubungan-gcg-dengan-tax.html
  112. Prasetyo, A. W., & Primasari, N. H. (2021). Pengaruh Komisaris Independen, Pertumbuhan
  113. Penjualan, Profitabilitas, Leverage, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Tax Avoidance.
  114. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 10(1).
  115. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.36080/jak.v10i1.1427
  116. Pratomo, D., & Rana, R. A. (2021). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional, Komisaris Independen
  117. dan Komite Audit Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi Kajian Ilmiah
  118. Akuntansi, 8(1), 91–103. https://ejurnal.lppmunsera.org/index.php/Akuntansi/article/view/2487
  119. Puspita, D., & Febrianti, M. (2017). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Penghindaran Pajak
  120. Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi,
  121. (1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.34208/JBA.V19I1.63
  122. Putri, Y. A., & Yanti, H. B. (2022). Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility, Kompensasi
  123. Manajemen, Intensitas Modal, Financial Distress Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal
  124. Ekonomi Trisakti, 2(2), 487–500.
  125. Sadya, S. (2023, April 13). Kinerja Industri Farmasi Tumbuh Tipis 0,69% Pada
  126. DataIndonesia.Id.
  127. Said, A. L. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility dalam Perspektif Governance (1st
  128. ed.). Deepublish.167
  129. Sari, N., Luthan, E., & Syafriyeni, N. (2020). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage, Komisaris
  130. Independen, Kepemilikan Institusional, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Penghindaran
  131. Pajak Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Pada Tahun
  132. -2018. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 20(2), 376–387.
  133. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v20i2.913
  134. Setyawan, S. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dan Good Corporate Governance
  135. (GCG): Pengaruh Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 4(2), 152–161.
  136. https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v4i2.17992
  137. Shanti, Y. K. (2020). Pengaruh Komite Audit Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Dengan
  138. Dewan Komisaris Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Kita, 9(2), 147–
  139. https://ejournal.stiesyariahbengkalis.ac.id/index.php/iqtishaduna/article/view/241
  140. Sihombing, D. Y., & Dalimunthe, I. P. (2022). Pengaruh Komisaris Independen, Kepemilikan
  141. Institusional, dan Pertumbuhan Laba Terhadap Tax Avoidance (Studi Empiris Pada
  142. Perusahaan Sub Industri Pharmaceuticals yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Selama
  143. Periode 2016-2020). Jurnal Revenue: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 3(1), 345–359.
  144. Sudarmanto, R. G. (2013). Statistik Terapan Berbasis Komputer dengan Program IBM SPSS
  145. Statistic 19. Mitra Wacana Media.
  146. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Penerbit Alfabeta.
  147. Sulistiyanti, U., & Saputra, A. D. (2020). Determinants of Tax Avoidance: Evidence from
  148. Indonesian Mining Industry. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 2(3), 165–174.
  149. Tahilia, A. M. S. T., Sulistyowati, & Wasif, S. K. (2022). Pengaruh Komite Audit, Kualitas
  150. Audit, dan Konservatisme Akuntansi terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan
  151. Manajemen (JAM), 19(2), 49–62.
  152. Utami, M., & Yohanes. (2023). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Tax Avoidance Pada Tata
  153. Kelola Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia. JURNAL AKUNTANSI, 17(1),
  154. –109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25170/jak.v17i1.3478
  155. Wahyuningrum, N. (2018). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance dan Corporate Social
  156. Responsibility terhadap Tax Avoidance (Studi pada Perusahaan Pertambangan yang
  157. Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014-2016).
  158. http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/162666
  159. Wijayanti, Y. C., & Merkusiwati, N. K. L. A. (2017). Pengaruh Proporsi Komisaris Independen,
  160. Kepemilikan Institusional, Leverage, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Pada Penghindaran Pajak.
  161. E- Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 20(1), 699–728

  1. Apip Apip  Vocational School, Diponegoro University, Indonesia, Indonesia
  2. Dwi Ratmono  Vocational School, Diponegoro University, Indonesia, Indonesia
  3. Rossiana Aulia Shinta Dewi  Economica and Bussines Faculty, Diponegoro University, Indonesia, Indonesia